Thank you for your contribution to the improvement of the INPN. The information submitted has been sent to an expert for verification and correction.
To get the picture, please visit:
Sylvain Déjean Association française d'arachnologie (AsFra)
email : inpn@mnhn.fr
Despite the Creative Commons license, please inform the author of the use which will be made of his photo
Segestria florentina (Rossi, 1790)
5.0/5 (3 votes)
Author : S. Déjean
Thank you for your contribution to the improvement of the INPN. The information submitted has been sent to an expert for verification and correction.
To get the picture, please visit:
Sylvain Déjean Association française d'arachnologie (AsFra)
email : inpn@mnhn.fr
Despite the Creative Commons license, please inform the author of the use which will be made of his photo
Segestria florentina (Rossi, 1790)
2.4/5 (10 votes)
Author : A. Canard
Thank you for your contribution to the improvement of the INPN. The information submitted has been sent to an expert for verification and correction.
To get the picture, please visit:
Alain Canard Biodiversité et gestion des territoires Université de Rennes 1 SPN, Av du Gal leclerc 30042 Rennes Cedex email: alain.canard@univ-rennes1.fr
Europe méridionale et centrale, Bassin méditerranéen
Caractères distinctifs, espèces
Taille - femelle : 15-22 mm, mâle : 10-15 mm.
La disposition des pattes avec trois paires orientées vers l'avant est caractéristique de la famille. Les adultes ont une couleur très spécifique : noire avec des chélicères à reflets couleur bronze ou verts. Il y a cinq espèces en France, S. florentina se reconnaît assez bien à sa grande taille et à sa couleur. Par contre les jeunes ont parfois la même coloration et spinulation des pattes antérieures que S. bavarica.
Milieux colonisés
L'espèce colonise les forêts, surtout les arbres morts, les rochers fissurés, les murets, ainsi que les maisons à l'extérieur mais aussi parfois à l'intérieur.
Chasse
L'espèce tisse une toile constituée de fils rayonnants avertisseurs à partir d'une retraite tubulaire. Elle se tient le soir à l'entrée de son tube, les pattes proches des fils rayonnants. Dès qu'une proie les touche, elle jaillit, saisit et mord sa victime qu'elle entraîne assez rapidement dans son repaire. Les proies peuvent être assez grandes et solides, ce sont des coléoptères, des lépidoptères, des hyménoptères, des cloportes, d'autres araignées…
Développement, cycle
Les femelles adultes sont présentes toute l'année, les mâles se rencontrent au printemps et en automne. L'espèce semble peu soumise aux facteurs périodiques du milieu, le cycle est difficile à caractériser.
La ponte a lieu à l'automne, le cocon est déposé sur un côté de la retraite. La femelle reste avec les jeunes jusqu'à leur dispersion.
A. Canard(Université de Rennes/Service du Patrimoine Naturel, MNHN),2014
The map presents a summary at the 10 x 10 km grid of the observation data for the species transmitted to the SINP. These data have been subjected to validation filters.
Distribution map from the Atlas of Departmental Biodiversity and Marine Sectors program
Current distribution in metropolitan France
The map presents a reference distribution layer of the species at the scale of departments and marine sectors. The presence and absence data were established by expertise within a network of partners. This reference distribution is used in the validation process of the SINP data at the INPN level.
Distribution map from the Atlas of Departmental Biodiversity and Marine Sectors program
Certain presence
Corresponds to a report on the basis of at least one observation proved within a period of 10 years (20 years for little-known invertebrates) preceding the year and no presumption of extinction since obtaining the last data nor doubt on reproductive and implemented nature of this population. For migratory species, the presence indicated concerns areas of reproduction.
Probable presence
This status is based on one or more of the following criteria:
search of species incomplete but presence of supportive environments;
ecology of the species consistent with the hypothesis of his presence;
the last reliable sighting is older than 10 years compared to the reference date, no recent specific research and no presumption of extinction from that date [vertebrates, invertebrates and plants well studied (rhopalocera, grasshoppers, dragonflies ...)] ;
the last reliable observation being older than 20 years, no recent specific research and no presumption of extinction from that date [poorly known taxa: fungus, many invertebrates...].
Probable or certain absence
This point covers the absence, more difficult by nature to demonstrate than presence. This status is based on one or more of the following criteria:
intensive but unsuccessful targeted research;
lack of adequate environments;
unobserved species while its presence is easily detected;
unlikely presence for historical or biogeographical reasons.
This status must be assigned to a department in which the presence of the species is casual.
Absence due to a proven extinction
Particular case of absence due to a proven extinction less than a half century ago (older disappearances are treated as "no probable or definite").
No information
In the state of knowledge, we can not comment on the presence or absence in the current department. This is the default status when not comprised in one of the previous categories or whenever there is doubt.