Thank you for your contribution to the improvement of the INPN. The information submitted has been sent to an expert for verification and correction.
To get the picture, please visit:
Ludovic Fuchs Office National des Forêts Maison Forestière d'Albet 84 rue des Quelles 67130 LA BROQUE e-mail : ludovic.fuchs@onf.fr>
Thank you for your contribution to the improvement of the INPN. The information submitted has been sent to an expert for verification and correction.
To get the picture, please visit: Julien Touroult UMS PatriNat (AFB - CNRS - MNHN) Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, CP41, 36 rue Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire, 75005 Paris
touroult[@]mnhn.fr
Legend:
Sur Mélèze. Hautes-Alpes.
Despite the Creative Commons license, please inform the author of the use which will be made of his photo
Capricorne au corps noir aux pattes brun rouge. Ses antennes sont brunes, les élytres parfois brun-rouge plus ou moins clair.
Détermination
La détermination est très délicate.
Espèces proches
Les espèces du genre Tetropium dont elle se distingue par le disque de son pronotum luisant, à ponctuation régulière et serrée, des antennes plus fines à articles tronqués perpendiculairement à l'apex. Le front ne présente pas de sillon net entre les yeux.
Période d'observation
L'adulte est actif de mai à juillet.
Biologie-éthologie
La larve se développe presque exclusivement sur les troncs et grosses branches mourantes de mélèze. Le cycle biologique dure un an. L'adulte est nocturne.
Biogéographie et écologie
Espèce centre-européenne en limite de répartition occidentale en France. En France, originellement connue des Alpes, elle est également signalée des plantations de mélèze du Massif central, du Jura et des Vosges.
Sources Berger, P. 2012. Coléoptères Cerambycidae de la faune de France continentale et de Corse - Actualisation de l'ouvrage d'André Villiers, 1978. Revue de l'Association Roussillonnaise d'Entomologie, supplément tome XXI, 664 p. Touroult, J., Cima, V., Bouyon, H., Hanot, C., Horellou, A., Brustel, H. 2019. Longicornes de France Atlas préliminaire (Coleoptera : Cerambycidae & Vesperidae). Supplément au bulletin d'ACOREP – France, Paris. 176 p.
L. Valladares (EIPurpan (UMR INRA / INPT 1201 Dynafor)),2022
The map presents a summary at the 10 x 10 km grid of the observation data for the species transmitted to the SINP. These data have been subjected to validation filters.
Distribution map from the Atlas of Departmental Biodiversity and Marine Sectors program
Current distribution in metropolitan France
The map presents a reference distribution layer of the species at the scale of departments and marine sectors. The presence and absence data were established by expertise within a network of partners. This reference distribution is used in the validation process of the SINP data at the INPN level.
Distribution map from the Atlas of Departmental Biodiversity and Marine Sectors program
Certain presence
Corresponds to a report on the basis of at least one observation proved within a period of 10 years (20 years for little-known invertebrates) preceding the year and no presumption of extinction since obtaining the last data nor doubt on reproductive and implemented nature of this population. For migratory species, the presence indicated concerns areas of reproduction.
Probable presence
This status is based on one or more of the following criteria:
search of species incomplete but presence of supportive environments;
ecology of the species consistent with the hypothesis of his presence;
the last reliable sighting is older than 10 years compared to the reference date, no recent specific research and no presumption of extinction from that date [vertebrates, invertebrates and plants well studied (rhopalocera, grasshoppers, dragonflies ...)] ;
the last reliable observation being older than 20 years, no recent specific research and no presumption of extinction from that date [poorly known taxa: fungus, many invertebrates...].
Probable or certain absence
This point covers the absence, more difficult by nature to demonstrate than presence. This status is based on one or more of the following criteria:
intensive but unsuccessful targeted research;
lack of adequate environments;
unobserved species while its presence is easily detected;
unlikely presence for historical or biogeographical reasons.
This status must be assigned to a department in which the presence of the species is casual.
Absence due to a proven extinction
Particular case of absence due to a proven extinction less than a half century ago (older disappearances are treated as "no probable or definite").
No information
In the state of knowledge, we can not comment on the presence or absence in the current department. This is the default status when not comprised in one of the previous categories or whenever there is doubt.
French Version
